The White Cube (Space Cadets:An exploration of context and its role in the contemporary artwork): Conclusion & References

As painting shifted from its role as a window of illusion in the late nineteenth century to questioning its own nature, the gilt-edged frame broke down, the sculpture came down from its plinth and the surrounding space was implicated in the work. The walls, acting as an extension of the frame, became the church of the Modernist movement and then an indispensable counterpart to modern, postmodern and contemporary art.

The white cube has been a cornerstone of the changes in art that have occurred throughout the twentieth century. In its first phase it provided a sacred place for the Modernist artwork that then, in hindsight, acted as a womb for the contemporary artwork. In its second it actively facilitated the artist in the exploration of myriad new ways to make art.

The marriage of the work with its context has had far reaching implications. The designation of the white cube as the art objects’ ideal context has enriched the practice of the contemporary artist enormously. The cube and the contemporary artwork are now co-dependent but this relationship took a long time to develop. As with all relationships first one element was in ascendancy then the other. This process was sometimes seen as negative sometimes as positive, a pendulum swing which currently seems to have reached a balance of sorts. This dissertation asked what the role of the white cube plays in the contemporary artwork. The answer is, like the cube itself, multifaceted.

The white cube was elemental in the dematerializing of the art object. With the move into the three dimensions of the cube, the focus shifted from the art object to the relationships around it so the crafting of the object using a traditional skillset became unnecessary. The art object changed from being an independent object, to be admired as separate from the viewer, to a touchstone for a multitude of possible encounters and relationships.

When this shift happened, traditional skills were more or less jettisoned for a period as artists explored new possibilities and this changed the role of the artist. The artist became an instigator and a selector, arranging works, materials, events or presenting ideas in the space. The notion of selection and interpretation as elements of an artwork took hold. This in turn opened up the arts to whoever wanted to contribute.

This had both positive and negative effects. There is an argument that with the jettisoning of skills the door was opened to anyone to become an artist, that somehow the wall which the artist had tried to break down had finally collapsed and that now there was nothing to define art.

But with the collapse of the standard of values provided by a recognisable skillset, the white cube became the boundary that allowed us to identify something as art. In taking on this role it came to represent an art institution of many aspects, physical, metaphysical, cultural, sociological and as such has been invaluable to the artist who would critique this institution to the benefit of the culture and the individuals within it.
Furthermore traditional skills have not died. Painting continues to reinvigorate itself as does sculpture. In the 1970s, alongside the selection and use of eclectic media, older crafts have been resurrected, crafts that were often considered the province of the disabled, children or women.This meant that the artist has now a huge armory to access, that there are a variety of voices to be heard, not just those of an elite but those belonging to previously marginalized groups. It also meant that it was harder to judge quality in a work and that opened the way to an element of dilettantism. With every new movement in the arts, a new language has had to be developed to describe and understand it. In contemporary times the shifts have been so huge that it may take some time before we can identify the seminal artworks of these times. This does not mean that contemporary art is not relevant but that’s its pluralistic nature means it has wider and deeper implications than can be understood from one aspect or from one point in time. In time we may see that the explorations of the intrepid artists who trusted the process enough, who eschewed immediate recognition for genuine questioning, have granted us insight into a complex present and an intimidating future.

The shift in the nature of the art object also created more responsibility for the viewer. A visitor to an exhibition of contemporary art now has to work to interpret art, they become part of it. The chance to be part of the work, to be forced to think, to consider, can only have good implications for the culture.

In De La Cruz’s Larger Than Life, the artwork in the form of the traditional canvas, came off the wall and expanded into the space, using painting itself as a signifier, enabling it, to comment on a wide range of issues around art and the artist’s role to art in our culture. The breaking down of the traditional skillset which saw the introduction of concept into the artwork, which opened art up to participants other than the white male elite, the reinstatement of traditional art through the use of appropriation combined with the signifiers of the white cube allowed De La Cruz, a woman, to produce an artwork that drew on traditional and Modernist painting and conceptual ideas. These developments could not have happened without the extra dimension and the protectiveness of the walls of the white cube. In the process the cube itself became a factor.

With Urs Fischer’s You, the cube becomes the focus of the artists’ actions. The meaning it has gathered to it, the roles it has played, enable the viewer to interpret the work in a number of ways. You shows us how powerful a cypher the cube is, that we can undermine it, tear it down, and not only does it survive but becomes stronger. It is possible to see the naked strength of the cube that became the sole definer of a vast diversity of art. While Fischer attacked the walls physically, Fraser used the signifiers of the cube, elegantly and eloquently, to ask the spectator to consider the gaps in society between the have and have nots. In the absence of an artwork, or any physical intervention at all, one may question the artists’ role. But works like this can inspire the spectator to think of the makeup of their culture and the value of this can be applicable by that spectator in their own lives. What is art except something that is supposed to enrich our lives? Conceptual work makes the viewer a part of that which enriches. Through Maurizio Cattelan we get a wider view of the contemporary artist’s role, the role of selection and context in the artwork and a critique of the Modernist canon. Through upending his own work and his own role he is ploughing a rich and fertile field, drawing on developments of the previous century, adapting them and scattering ideas as he goes.

The white cube has simultaneously activated the artwork and been accused of smothering it, faded into the background while becoming a vigorous element in the creation and perception and interpretation of art. For the artist it is a laboratory for experimentation, a safe place for edgy new art, the target for exploration and weapon for critique. It is the indispensable ‘other’ in the artists’ actions, an arena for the acting out of a multitude of relationships between the artist and the artwork, the viewer and the space itself. The white cube has proved a flexible counterpart to the physical artwork and an arena and a metaphor for more ephemeral work. While it is to some a tomb (Smithson), a dead space, it still inspired artists to set up shop as Claes Oldenburg did or flee out into the desert as the Land Artists did. Even the rise of the alternative space implies it’s opposite: the pristine gallery. The cavernous ragged warehouse or the old factory echoes the white cubes’ laboratory like demeanor, the place of presentation of the finished object harks back to the studio.

On a larger stage, the white cube represents western elitism while providing a counterweight for those artists who seek to change the status quo. It is a tool of the market, a representative of capitalism while in its very church like demeanor affects to be above ‘all-that’ (cite). In the cube, relationships between multiple elements, be they in the shape of people (the artists, the viewer, the curator, the collector), place (past, present, and future), ideologies (ideas, theories, beliefs) continuously move and shift, swapping places, gaining and losing ascendancy spinning on a fulcrum provided by first one element then another. The white cube provides a crucible as well as an ‘other’, an essential différance in the kaleidoscopic, multi-dimensional process we now call art. Its innumerable aspects are often paradoxical, for the cube is a conundrum. It is at once real and imaginary, a concept and a physical reality. An understanding of it seems to be impossible to grasp in its entirety. Once we think we understand it, its meaning slithers away. In a pluralistic world the cube manages to provide the most paradoxical of things: an indefinable touchstone, a boundary-less entity, solid ground that shifts constantly beneath our feet.

From the standpoint of the early twenty-first century, it is possible to get the beginning of an overview of all the aspects of the white cube-negative, positive, ambiguous- and see them as part of a whole. One thread still unspooling, is in the arena of the amateur artist. When craftsmanship took a back seat to new possibilities in the professional art world, in the amateur world, the anything goes attitude to skill trickled down but often not much else. The traditional formats of painting and sculpture were maintained but conceptual aspects have been bypassed. For instance the ‘bad painting’ of the professional world, with its conceptual applications and developed visual language, has been interpreted in the amateur world as a license to create merely bad painting. It is the artifying power of the white cube gives amateur work of this stripe gravitas. While it can be argued that this is the risk that comes with freedom, it means in certain places the only art that is accessible to the populace is bad art. While the language of contemporary art is in theory accessible to anyone, those who are only exposed to a framework of ABCs, cannot progress, do not even know there is progression to be had, as long as they are distracted by the straw man of the high street white cube. This is probably the most negative aspect of the artifying effect of the white cube. However, there are plenty of talented amateur artists too. It remains to be seen if the polarization of small communities will hinder development or actually, in the long run, promote an even richer diversity of activities. We are, as with many things on an arc of development that may only be seen in hindsight.

It has been forty years since O’Doherty said that context provides a large part of late modern and postmodern arts’ content and that this was the strength as well as weakness of art in the 1970s (O’Doherty, 1999, p.79). Today context still plays a major role, artists still wrestle with the ‘museum effect’ (Hantelmann, 2008), but in the intervening years, the efforts of artists to redefine art, to separate it from the institution have seen a shift. The white cube has entered the language to such an extent that it is possible that, while it can still represent the institution for those who would critique it, it no longer threatens to overwhelm or contain the artwork. The resilience it has shown, which once may have been frustrating, means that artist can move away from it, safe in the knowledge the cube is there as an anchor.

The artists this dissertation has discussed have operated in direct relation with the cube and its signifiers. In the last decade or so other artists have taken to the streets, to allotments, parks, gatherings, festivals, communities as well as deserts and urban landscapes and increasingly the parallel reality of the internet. This not the desperate escape of the rebellious, idealistic artist of the age of Aquarius but the curiosity of a more cynical but still curious artist of a diverse world, not fleeing but setting out from their permanent base to get a new perspective. The white cube remains a tangible hub, a pivot, a yardstick, a safe harbour in a sea of possibilities. The artist can explore different realms as once the explorers of the Elizabethan age did, absenting themselves from the court for years at a time, returning to have their treasures and new knowledge ratified, their experience gradually absorbed into the collective consciousness.

While not perfect-and, typically, in this very imperfection it may be perfect-the white cube is the vehicle with which we navigate the explosion of possibility that is contemporary culture. The nature of it is continuously paradoxical. Its walls, while being a frame for the traditional or modernist art piece can also be a foil to a seemingly infinite variety of works: the backdrop for the spectator’s imagination, a static arena for the dynamic performance, metaphor for the conceptualist. The white cube has become a cypher, reflecting our cultures insecurities, its habit of self-examination and deconstruction, its pluralism and its philosophies. The white cube is an integral part of the artwork, vital to the artist in conveying meaning, elemental in the viewer’s perception and indispensable to an artwork that would communicate with disparate populace of this diverse world. The aesthetic of the ideal modern art space, the white-walled gallery or the white cube, has shown extraordinary resilience. Loaded with meaning gathered over a century of explosive change the versatile cube responded, and continues to respond, to all comers.

References & Bibliography

Acconci, V., (2003), Building an Island, Graz:Acconci Studio.
Ades, D.,(1974), Dada and Surrealism in Stangos, N., (1994), Concepts Of Modern Art:From Fauvism to Postmodernism, 3rd ed, London:Thames & Hudson.
Alberro, A., (2005), Museum Highlights:The Writings of Andrea Fraser, Cambridge:
All Art News, (2010), Hirshhorn Museum Presents Selection of Works by Josef Albers, in All Art News, [online] January, 8th, available at [accessed 7/11/2016].
Anon, (1917), The Richard Mutt Case, in Evans, D., ed., (2009) Appropriation, London:Whitechapel Gallery and MIT Press.
Archer, M., (2002), Art Since 1960, 2nd ed., London:Thames & Hudson.
Artnet, (2016), Fabian Marcaccio, [online], available: [accessed 07/02/2016].
Artnet, (2016), Karen Kilimnik, [online], available: [accessed 07/02/2016].
Art People Gallery, (2015), Artist J.Frede’s Creates Landscapes Artwork by Mixing Photos He Finds at Flea Markets,[online], available: [accessed 22/11/2015].
Art Tribune, (2015), Andrea Fraser, Little Frank and His Carp, 2001 – Video stills – Generali Foundation Collection, Art Tribune, [online], June 11th, available at [accessed 6/11/2016].
Avgikos, J., (2008), Maurizio Cattelan:Dear Maurizio in Spector, N., (2008), theanyspacewhatever, New York, Guggenheim Museum Publications.

Ballon, H., Carranza, L.E., (2009), The Guggenheim: Frank Lloyd Wright and the Making of the Modern Museum, New York, Guggenheim Museum Publications.
Banksy, (2005), Wall and Piece, London:Century, The Random House Group.
Barker, E., ed. (1999), Contemporary Cultures of Display, Newhaven and London:The Open University Press in Association with Yale University Press.
Barry, J., (1986), Dissenting Spaces in Greenberg, R., Ferguson, B.W., Nairne,S., (1996) Thinking about Exhibitions, London, Routledge.
Barry, P., (1995), Beginning Theory, Manchester:Manchester University Press.
Bass, C., (2016), When Institutional Critique Doesn’t Go Far Enough, in Hypoallergic, March 8th, [online], available at [accessed 26/09/2016]
Baudrillard, J. (1981),Simulacra and Simulations, [online], available: [accessed 16/11/2015].
Baudrillard, J., (1976) ,The Critique of Originality in Harrison, C., Wood, P., eds., (2003)Art in Theory 1900-2000:An Anthology of Changing Ideas, 2nd ed.,, Malden, USA:Blackwell Publishing.
Barthes, R., (1967), Death of the Author, translated by Howard, R., Ubu Web, [online], available: [accessed 26/11/2015].
Benjamin, W., (1936), The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction, (1936) in Frascina, F.Harris, J., eds., (1992) Art in Modern Culture:An Anthology of Critical Texts, London:Open University.
Benjamin,W.,(2006), Interview with Beti Zerovc, in Evans, D., ed.(2009) Appropriation, London:Whitechapel Gallery and MIT Press.
Berndes, C., (2007), Replicas and Reconstructions in Twentieth-Century Art, Tate Papers, no.8, Autumn 2007, [online], available:, [accessed 20/04/2016].
Bertaux, F., (2004), Urs Fischer, Livre NO.8, Paris:Centre National D’art et de Culture, Georges Pompidou.
Bonami, F., Manacorda, F., (Eds) (2006), Maurizio Cattelan, Verona:Mondadori Electa.
Bonami, F., Spector, N., Vanderlinden, B., (2000), Maurizio Cattelan, London, Phaidon.
Borteh, L., (2016), Gerhard Richter, German Painter, [online], available: [accessed 03/02/2016].
Broude, N., Garrard, M. D., (1994), The Power of Feminist Art: Emergence, Impact and Triumph of the American Feminist Art Movement, NewYork:Harry N. Abrahms.
Britannica, (Last updated 09/02/2014), Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, [online], available: [accessed 12/04/2015]
Bryan-Wilson, J., (2009), Queerly Made: Harmony Hammond’s Floorpieces, The Journal of Modern Craft Volume2, Issue 1, [online], available: [accessed 22/11/2015].
Bryson, B., (2010), At Home:A Short History of Private Life, London:Transworld Books
Buren, D., (1975), The Function of Architecture in Greenberg, R., Ferguson, B.W., Nairne,S.,(1996), Thinking about Exhibitions, London, Routledge.
Burger, P. (1984), The Theory of the Avant Garde, Minneapolis,University of Minnesota Press.
Burns, C. (2015), Whitney Museum Turns Over its Column Free Fifth Floor to Artists, in The Art Newspaper, December 10th, [online], available at [accessed 26/09/2016]
Burns, C., (2016), Andrea Fraser: The Artist Turning the Whitney into a Prison, in The Guardian, February 23rd 2016 [online], available: [accessed 01/04/2016].
Burn, I., (1975), Affluence and Degradation in Harrison, C., Wood, P., eds., (2003), Art in Theory 1900-2000:An Anthology of Changing Ideas, 2nd ed., Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing
Butler, C., (2002), Postmodernism:A Very Short Introduction,Oxford:Oxford University Press.

Cage, J., (1969, On Robert Rauschenberg, Artist and His Work in Harrison, C., Wood, P., eds., (2003), Art in Theory 1900-2000:An Anthology of Changing Ideas 2nd ed., Malden, USA, Blackwell Publishing., (2016), Angela De La Cruz:Larger Than Life at the Galerie Thomas Schulte, Berlin, 2015, [online], available at, [accessed 12/11/2016]. (2016), Frank Stella, [online], available: [accessed 18/04/2016].
Cattelan, M., (2011), Artistic License, in W Magazine, Art Issue, November 2011, [online], available at [accessed 28/11/2016].
Clarke, D., Watt, T., (2016), Overlooked Spaces:Declan Clarke Talks to Tom Watt About His Habitations of Overlooked Spaces in The Visual Artists New Sheet, Issue 3 , May-June 2016 p. 12-13.
Coogan, A., (2002), The Quiet Man, video, exhibited at I’ll sing you a song from around the town, RHA, Dublin, 2015.
Crimp, D., (1982), Appropriating Appropriation in Evans, D., ed., (2009) Appropriation, London:Whitechapel Gallery and MIT Press.
Crimp, D., (1993), On the Museums Ruins, London:MIT Press.
Cross, D., Lydenberg, R., (2014), Connemara, 2nd ed., Dublin & Letterfrack:Royal Hibernian Academy in association with Artisan House Editions.
Curiger, B., Fischer, U., Gioni, F., Morgan, J., (2009), Shovel in a Hole, Zurich, JRP|Ringier.
Curiger, B., (2009), Space Generated by Vision or Basements Save Windows in Curiger, B., Fischer, U., Gioni, F., Morgan, J., (2009), Shovel in a Hole, Zurich, JRP|Ringier.

Davies, L. (2009), Paris Host New Exhibition of Nothing, in The Guardian, March 2nd, [online], available at [accessed 26/09/2016].
Davis, M., (2006), City of Quartz: Excavating the Future in Los Angeles, 2nd ed., London:Verso.
Debord, G.,Wolman, G. J., (1956), Directions For the Use of Detournement, in Evans, D., ed., (2009), Appropriation, London:Whitechapel Gallery and MIT Press.
Dengerink Chaplin, A., (2005), Art and Embodiment: Biological and Phenomenological Contributions to Understanding Beauty and the Aesthetic, in Contemporary Aesthetics [online], available: e/pages/article.php?articleID=291 [accessed 19/04/2016].
Deicher, S., (2004), Mondrian:Structures in Space, London:Taschen.
Derrida, J., (1967), Writing and Difference, translated by The University of Chicago, London & New York: Routledge.
Designboom (2013), Maurizio Cattelan’s 5 horses at Fondation Beyeler, architecture & design magazine, [online], available: [accessed 20/04/2016].
Didier,S., Garb, T., Kuspit, D., (1997), Christian Boltanski, London:Phaidon Press Ltd.
Lumley, R., (2010, Germano Celant:The Arte Povera period in Domus [online] available [accessed 04/08/2016]
Drennen, C., (2010), Good Boy: Urs Fischer at The New Museum, in Drain Magazine, rewind Issue, Vol. 7:1, 2010, [online] available at [accessed 01/08/2016].
Droste, M., (1993), Bauhaus, Berlin, Bauhaus-Archiv Museum Fur Gestaltung.
Duchamp, M., (1957), The Creative Act in Petersen, E., Sanouoillet, M., eds., (1975), The Essential Writings of Marcel Duchamp, [online], available: [accessed 08/04/2016].
Durden, M., (2009), Sherrie Levine, in Frieze magazine, issue 125, [online], available: [accessed 17/11/2015].
Dziewior, Y., (2003), Andrea Fraser, Hamburg:Dumont.

Egenhofer,S., (2008), Figures of Defiguration:Four Theses on Abstraction, in Myers, T. R., ed., (2011), Painting, London:Whitechapel Gallery and MIT Press.
Evans, D., ed.,(2009), Appropriation, London:Whitechapel Gallery and MIT Press.
Evans, D., d., (2009), Seven Types of Appropriation, in Evans,D., ed., (2009), Appropriation, London:Whitechapel Gallery and MIT Press.
Ewart, M., (2015), Patrick Graham:Primal Scream, April 6th 2015, [online], available: [accessed 03/02/2016].

Ferguson, B.W., Greenberg, R., Nairne, S., eds. (1996), Thinking About Exhibitions, New York: Routledge.
Fernie, E., (1995), Art History and its Methods:A Critical Anthology, London: Phaidon Press.
Fischer, U., Matt, G., (2012), Skinny Sunrise, Vienna, Kiito-San.
Foster, H., (2015), After the White Cube, London Review of Books, Vol. 37 No. 6 ,19th March 2015, [online], available: accessed 29/02/2016 [accessed 24/03/2016].
Foster, H., Krauss, R., Bois, Y-A.,Buchloh, B.H.D., Joselit, D., (2011), Art Since 1900, 2nd ed., London:Thames & Hudson.
Foster, H., Kuo, M., Bell, K., Lange, C., Sherwin, S., Rugoff, R., (2010), The New Décor, London:Hayward Publishing.
Foster, H., (1986), Signs Taken for Wonders in Myers, T.R., ed.,(2011) Painting, London:Whitechapel Gallery.
Foucault, M., (2012), Manet and the Object of Painting, reprint ed., London:Tate Publishing.
Foucault, M., (1984), Of Other Spaces:Utopias and Heterotopias, in Architecture /Mouvement/ Continuité , October, 1984 [online], available: [accessed 15/04/2016].
Frascina, F., Blake, N. P., Fer, B., Garb, T., Harrison, C., (1993), Modernity & Modernism : French Painting in the 19th Century, London:Yale University Press.
Frascina, F., Harris, J., eds.,(1992) Art in Modern Culture:An Anthology of Critical Texts, London:Open University.
Fraser, A., (2016), Andrea Fraser Interviewed by Thryza Nicholas Goodeve in The Brooklyn Rail, April 6th, [online], available at [accessed 26/09/2016].
Fraser, A., (2002), Exhibition, Vancouver:National Library of Canada Cataloguing in Publication.
Fraser, A., (1985), In and out of Place in Greenberg, R., Ferguson, B.W., Nairne, S., eds. (1996), Thinking About Exhibitions, London:Routledge.

Gabbatt, A., (2016), On the throne: what it’s like to use the Guggenheim’s solid gold toilet, in The Guardian, September 16th, [online], available at [accessed 15/11/2016].
Galerie Thomas Schulte, (2015), Angela De La Cruz, [online] available at [accessed 18/10/2016]
Garage Museum of Contemporary Art (2016), Urs Fischer:Small Axe, [online], available at [accessed 01/08/2016].
Gioni, M., (2009), This is my Grandmother, She Makes Really Genius Cakes:An Interview With Urs Fischer in Curiger, B., Fischer, U., Gioni, F., Morgan, J., (2009), Shovel in a Hole, Zurich, JRP|Ringier.
Godfrey, T., (1998), Conceptual Art, London:Phaidon Press.
Godfrey, T., (2009), Painting Today, London:Phaidon Press.
Goodeve, T. N. (2016), Andrea Fraser With Thyrza Nichols Goodeve, in Brooklyn Rail [online], April 6th, available at [accessed 26/09/2016].
Goodeve, T. N. (2003), Andrea Fraser and Thyrza Nichols Goodeve Talk About ‘Exhibition’, in Fraser, A., (2002), Exhibition, Vancouver:National Library of Canada Cataloguing in Publication
Greenberg, C., (1939), The Avant Garde and Kitsch, in Greenberg, C., (1961), Art and Culture: Critical Essays, [online], available at [accessed 9/11/2016].
Greenberg, C., (1961), Art and Culture: Critical Essays, [online], available at [accessed 6/12/2016].
Greenberg, R., Ferguson, B.W., Nairne, S., eds. (1996), Thinking About Exhibitions, London:Routledge.
Greenberg, R. (1996), The Exhibited Redistributed:A case for Reassessing Space in Greenberg, R., Ferguson, B.W., Nairne,S., (1996) Thinking about Exhibitions, London, Routledge.
Groys, B.,Ross, D., Blazwick, I., (1998), Ilya Kabakov, London:Phaidon Press.
Grunenberg, C., (1999), The Museum of Modern Art, in Barker, E., ed. (1999), Contemporary Cultures of Display, Newhaven and London:The Open University Press in Association with Yale University Press.
The Guggenheim Collection, The Great Upheaval: Modern Art From the Guggenheim Collection 1910–1918 [online], available: [accessed 15/11/2014],(2016), Maurizio Cattelan:All, [online], available at [accessed 18/04/2016]., (2016), Maurizio Cattelan:America, [online], available at [accessed 15/11/2016]
Guilbert, C.G., (1957), Propos de Brancusi in Prisme des Arts 12,
Guyton, W. (2014), Robert Morris, in Interview Magazine, 1st June 2014 [online] available at

Hantelmann, D.V., (2008), Dominique Gonzalez Foerster:Back to the Future in Spector, N., (2008), theanyspacewhatever, New York, Guggenheim Museum Publications.
Harrison, C., Wood, P., eds., (2003), Art in Theory 1900-2000:An Anthology of Changing Ideas, 2nd ed., Malden, USA:Blackwell Publishing
Harrison, C., (1997), Modernism , London:Tate Gallery Publishing.
Heartney, Eleanor (2001), Postmodernism, London:Tate Gallery.
Holtzman, H., James, M.S., eds. (1986), New Art-The New Life:The Collected writings of Piet Mondrian, London, Thamses & Hudson.
Hudson, S., (2015), Painting Now, London:Thames & Hudson.
Hughes, R,. (1991), The Shock of the New:Art and the Century of Change, 2nd ed., London:Thames & Hudson.
Huffington,A.,(1988), Picasso, Creator and Destroyer, New York:Simon & Schuster

Ingleby gallery, (2016), Alison Watt, [online], available: [accessed 02/02/2016].

Jack Rutberg Fine Arts, (2016), Patrick Graham, [online], available: [accessed 03/02/2016].
James, J., (1996), Pop Art, London:Phaidon Press.
Janssen, H., (1997), Bringing About Light:On the Function of colour in Mondrian’s Painting in Mondrian: Nature to Abstraction, London:Tate Gallery.
Jencks, C., (1986), What is Postmodernism?, 3rd ed., London:Academy Editions, St. Martins Press.
Judd, D. (1965), Specific Objects in Harrison, C., Wood, P., eds., (2003) Art in Theory 1900-2000:An Anthology of Changing Ideas 2nd ed, Malden, USA:Blackwell Publishing.

Kaack, N., (2016), Unbridgeable Gap:Andrea Fraser brings Sing Sing to Whitney, in Artcritical, April 16th, [online], available at [accessed 26/09/2016.
Kachur, L., (2003), Displaying the Marvelous: Marcel Duchamp, Salvador Dali and Surrealist Exhibition Installations, 2nd ed., Cambridge:MIT Press.
Kasper, C., (2008), Urs Fischer: You @ GBE in New York, October 25- December 22, 2007 in White Hot Magazine, [online] available at [accessed 6/11/2016].
Kidel, M., ( 2013), John Baldessari, issue No.5 [online], available: [accessed 15/11/2015].
Koons, J., (1992), Jeff Koons Handbook, London:Thames & Hudson Ltd.
Krauss, R.E., (1986) Postmodernism’s Museum Without Walls in Greenberg, R., Ferguson, B.W., Nairne,S., (1996), Thinking about Exhibitions, London, Routledge.
Krystof, D., Morgan, J., eds.,(2006), Martin Kippenberger, London:Tate Publishing.
Kubler, G., (1962), The Shape of Time:Remarks on the History of Things, Newhaven and London:Yale University Press.
Kuenzli, R.,E., Naumann, F.,N., eds., (1996), Marcel Duchamp:Artist of the Century, MIT Press
Kuritz, P., (1988), The Making of Theatre History, London:Prentice Hall College.
Kuriyama E.A., (2013), Everything You Need to Know About Chris Burden’s Art Through His Greatest Works, in Complex, [online], October 2nd, available at [accessed 6/11/2016].

Lambe, C. (2012), The Last Word – A Report on the Retirement of Maurizio Cattelan , in Roll Magazine [online], available at [accessed 7/11/2016].
Latimer, T., (2014), Becoming UnBecoming, [online], available: [accessed 26/04/2015].
Lelong, G., (2001),Daniel Buren, Paris:Flammarion.
Lewison, J., (1999), Interpreting Pollock, London:Tate Gallery Publishing.
Lichfield, J., (2009), The Art of Nothing: Pompidou Centre Celebrates Half a Century of Minimalism,in The Independent, February 27th, [online], available at [accessed 26/09/2016]
Lippard, L., (1995), The Pink Glass:Selected Feminist Essays, New York: The New Press., (2016), Angela de la Cruz, [online], available at [accessed 10/11/2016].
Lyotard, J.F., (1979), Introduction to the Postmodern Condition in Harrison, C., Wood, P., eds., (2003), Art in Theory 1900-2000:An Anthology of Changing Ideas 2nd ed., Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing.

Malone, M., (2007), Andrea Fraser:What do I, as an Artist, Provide?, Mildred Lane Kemper Art Museum, [online] available at [accessed24/07/2016].
Martin, R., (2014), Andrea Fraser:Little Frank and his Carp 2001 [online] available at [accessed 8/11/2016].
Meyer, J., (2000), Minimalism, London, Phaidon Press.
McEvilley,T., (1986), Introduction:Inside the White Cube:The Ideology of the Gallery Space in O’Doherty, B. and McEvilley, T. (1999), Inside the White Cube: The Ideology of the Gallery Space, expanded edition. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Miller, S., (2010), Constantin Brancusi, London:Reaktion Books.
Milner, J., (1995), Mondrian, London:Phaidon Press.
Mindel, L.F., (2014), The Architects Eye:Architect Otto Wagners Modernist Marvels in Vienna, Architectural Digest, February 28th 2014 [online], available at,(The Museum of Contemporary Art), (2016), Collection:Chris Burden:Exposing the Foundations of the Museum,[online] available at [accessed 6/11/2016]., (The Museum of Modern Art), (2016), MOMA Starts:An 80th Anniversary Exhibition, [online], available at [accessed 6/11/2016].
Mondrian P., (1919-1920), Natural Reality and Abstract Reality: A Trialogue (While strolling from the Country to the City) in Holtzman, H., James, M.S., eds. (1986), New Art-The New Life:The Collected writings of Piet Mondrian, London, Thamses & Hudson.
Mousse Magazine (2012), Urs Fischer “Madame Fisscher” at Palazzo Grassi, Venice, April 24~2012, in Mousse Magazine no. 33, [online] available at [accessed 01/08/2016].
Mulleavy, K., Mulleavy, L., (2011), Karen Kilimnik, in Interview Magazine, March issue, [online], available: [accessed 02/02/2016]
Mulvey, L., (1991), A Phantasmagoria of the Female Body:The Work of Cindy Sherman in Evans, D., ed., (2009), Appropriation, London:Whitechapel Gallery and MIT Press.
Myers, T. R., ed., (2011), Painting, London:Whitechapel Gallery and MIT Press.

Naifeh, S., Smith, G.W., (1989), Jackson Pollock:An American Saga, New York:Clarkson N. Potter.
Newhouse, V., (2005), Art and the Power of Placement, New York:The Monacelli Press.
Nochlin L. (1971), Why Have There Been No Great Women Artists?, in Nochlin L., (1989) Women, Art, Power and Other Essays, London:Thames and Hudson.

O’Doherty, B. and McEvilley, T. (1999), Inside the White Cube: The Ideology of the Gallery Space, expanded edition. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
O’Doherty, B., (2007), Studio and Cube:On the Relationship Between Where Art is Made and Where Art is Displayed, New York: The Temple Hoyne Buell Center for the Study Of Architecture
Ohrt, R., (1997), Kippenberger, translated by Goodden, C.B., Hamburg:Taschen.
Pfaff, L., ed., (2006), Art Becomes Architecture:A Conversation between Vito Acconci and Kenny Schachter, New York, Springer Wien.

Platzer, D., (2016), A Guest + A Host = A Ghost, [online] available at [accessed 01/08/2016].
Praxis, (2004), In Conversation:Andrea Fraser in Brooklyn Rail, October 1st, [online], available at [accessed 26/09/2016]
Punji, R (2014), Interview with Joana Vasconcelos: Interventions in Kitsch in The Culture Trip, [online], available: [accessed 16/11/2015].
Putnam, J., (2009), Art and Artifact:The Museum as Medium, 2nd Ed., London:Thames and Hudson., (2016), Minimalism, Theatricality and Architecture: The Expanded Field of Sculpture,, [online], available: [accessed 17/04/2016].
Rainbird, S., ed., (1997), Mondrian: Nature to Abstraction, London:Tate Gallery.
Raunig, G., Ray, G., eds., (2009), Art and Contemporary Critical Practise:Reinventing Insitutional Critique, London:MayflyBooks, [online], available at [accessed 8/11/2016].
Reed, C., (1994), Postmodernism and the Art of the Identity in Stangos, N., (1994), Concepts Of Modern Art:From Fauvism to Postmodernism, 3rd ed., London:Thames & Hudson.
Reed, J., (2012), Nam June Paik:The Artist Who Invented Video Art available in National Endowment for the Arts Magazine, Issue 2012 no.4, [online], available: [accessed 19/07/2016].
Rian, J., (1996)…è andato a casa in Flash Art International[online], No.190, available at [accessed 7/11/2016].
Riley, B.,(1997),  Mondrian Perceived in Rainbird, S., ed., (1997), Mondrian: Nature to Abstraction, London:Tate Gallery Publishing.
Rosenberg, B., (2010), Baldessari :Pure Beauty, The Art Story, [online], available: [accessed 16/11/2015].
Rosenberg, H., (1952), The American Action Painters, in ArtNews, December 51/8, [online], available at [accessed 25/11/2016}
Rosenthal, M., (1989), Anselm Kiefer, trade ed., Munich: Prestel Publishing.
Rubenstein, R., (2004), The Painting Undone, [online], available: [accessed 17/11/2015].

Scott, C. (2016), Jeremy Hutchinson, Fabrications, at Still The Barbarians:EV+A 2016, The Cleeves Biscuit Factory, Limerick, Unpublished photograph.
Saltz, J., (2007), Can You Dig It?At Gavin Brown, Urs Fischer takes a jackhammer to Chelsea itself in The New York Magazine, November 25th, [online] available at [accessed 01/08/2016]
Saltz, J., (2008), Two Coats of Painting:Urs Fischer at the Tony Shafrazi Gallery, New York, New York Magazine, June 15th 2008, [online], available at [accessed [01/08/2016].
Schama, S., (2004), Hang-Ups: Essays on Painting (Mostly) London, BBC Books.
Schiff, R., (2004), Safe From Birds, in Serota, N., ed., (2004), Donald Judd, London: Tate Publishing.
Shiue, A., (2016), Open Plan: Andrea Fraser – Down the River (video), Vimeo, [online], available at [accessed 7/11/2016].
Schwabsky, B.,(2002),Vitamin P:New Perspectives in Painting, London:Phaidon Press.
Schwendener, M., (2008) , Female Trouble:Richard Prince and Cindy Sherman in The Village Voice, December 10th 2008, [online], available: [accessed 26/11/2015].
Searle, A., (2010), Angela de la Cruz’s Brush With Death, April 5th 2010, [online], available: [02/02/2016].
Serota N., (2004), Donald Judd:A Sense of Place in Serota, N., ed.,(2004), Donald Judd, London:Tate Publishing.
Serota, N., (1996), Experience or Interpretation, London:Thames & Hudson.
Sherwin, S., (2011), Andrew Grassie:Artist of the Week, The Guardian, April 1st, [online], available: [accessed 22/11/2015].
Sirmans, F., (2010), Maurizio Cattelan:Is There Life before Death?, London and Newhaven:Yale University Press.
Smith, P. (1995), Impressionism:Beneath the Surface, New York:H.N. Abrahms.
Smith, R., (1992), Art in Review in the New York Times, September 25th,[online], available: [accessed 22/11/2015].
Smith, R., (2008) When Artwoks Collide, the New York Times, May 16th, 2008, [online], available: [accessed 01/08/2016].
Smith, R., (2011), A Suspension of Willful Disbelief in The New York Times, November 3rd, [online], available at [accessed 26/09/2016].
Sontag, S., (1964), Against Interpretation in Fernie, E., (1995), Art History and its Methods:A Critical Anthology, London: Phaidon Press.
Spector, N., (2001), Guggenheim Museum A-Z, New York, Guggenheim Museum Publications.
Spector, N., (2008), theanyspacewhatever:an exhibition in ten parts, New York, Guggenheim Museum Publications.
Spector N., (2009), The Museum as Catalyst in Ballon, H., et al, (2009), The Guggenheim: Frank Lloyd Wright and the Making of the Modern Museum, New York: Guggenheim Museum Publications.
Spector, N., (2011), Maurizio Cattelan:All, New York:Guggenheim Museum Publications.
Stangos, N., (1994), Concepts Of Modern Art:From Fauvism to Postmodernism, 3rd ed., London:Thames & Hudson.
Strickland, E., (1993), Minimalism:Origins, Bloomington:Indiana University Press.
Sweetman, B., (1999), Derrida and Différance: A Critique, [online], available at file:///C:/Users/20029571/Downloads/CJ%20Seminar%203%20-%20Working%20group%201%20C%20-%20Postmodern%20Legal%20Theories.pdf [accessed 26/11/2016].

Tani, E. Y., (2015), What Makes Contemporary Art Feminist?,Artsy, [online], available: [accessed 02/11/2015]. (2016), Robert Morris:Untitled 1965, reconstructed 1971, [online] available at [accessed 01/08/2016], (2016), Sol LeWitt, Six Geometric Figures (+ Two) [online], available: [accessed 20/04/2016]. website,(2016), Josef Albers:American Painter, Poet, Sculptor, Teacher, and Theoretician, [online]. Available at [accessed 10/11/2016].
Thornton, S., (2014), 33 Artists in 3 Acts, London:Granta Publications.
Thornton, S., (2009), Seven Days in the Art World, London:W.W. Norton & Company.
Tickner, L., (1984), Sexuality and/in Representation, Evans, D., ed.,(2009), Appropriation, London:Whitechapel Gallery and MIT Press.
Tipton,G.,ed.,(2005), Space:Architecture for Art, Dublin:Circa.
Tomkins,C.,(2009), The Imperfectionist:Urs Fischers Inspired Sloppiness, New York Times Magazine, October 19th, 2009, [online], available: [accessed 14/04/2016].
Tomkins, C., (2016), Gold Toilet, New Yorker Magazine, Septemeber 14th [online], available at [accessed 15/11/2016].
Tomkins, C., (2010), No More Boring Art:John Baldessari’s Crusade, New Yorker Magazine, October 18th, [online], available at [accessed 15/11/2015].
Tufnell, B., (2006), Land Art, London:Tate Publishing.
Turner, C., (2005), The Greatest Little Gallery on Earth, in The Guardian, 21st December, [online] available at [accessed] 03/11/2016.

Van Doesburg, T., (1917), De Nieuwe Beweging, Delft: J. Waltman.
Van Tongerloo, G., (1924), L’Art et Son Avenir, Antwerp:De Sikkel.
Viveros-Faune, C., (2016), Andrea Fraser Brings the Sounds of Sing Sing to the Whitney Museum,, [online], available: [accessed 10/04/2016].
Vogel, C., (2013), Retired Maurizio Cattelan in Swiss Exhibition, New York Times, May 23rd, 2013, [online], available: [accessed 18/04/2016].
Vogt, J. M., (2012), Archive for the ‘Maurizio Cattelan’ Category:Italy is Still an Art World Leader, [blog], Artitis [online], available at [accessed 7/11/2016].

Ward, O., (2014), Ways of Looking, London:Laurence King Publishing.
Warncke, C. P., (1991), De Stijl 1917-1931, Cologne:Taschen, (2016), Open Plan: Andrea Fraser,Whitney Museum of American Art, [online],available: [accessed 18/04/2016].
Wood, S., (2006), The Goodies and Baddies of the Art World, [online], available: [accessed 29/04/2015].
Zoowithoutanimals,(2015) Baldessari available at [accessed 15/11/2015]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s